The Sailor Moon Pocky Box : Reviews
|
|
|
Layout & Design Is the layout intuitive and easy to navigate? Is it compatible across all browsers and resolution? Is it aesthetically pleasing? |
EudialLet me say, it took way too long to get this review done. The dang site refused to open for me these past two days. >.< Argh! Anywho, layout. Nicely done splash page. Everything is in order and the color isnt bad either. Ok, moving on... WOW! Happy massively amount of pink! lol. On first glance, this site looks decent in the layout department. THe update section is to the left of the page, and the navigation is on the right side. Alright, the navigation is seperated into multiple sections; guild related, interactive, For You, Graphics, Layouts, BSSM, Codename Wa Sailor V, PGSM, Sailor Moon, Members Corner. Ya know, just from all the sections, this site looks like its got a lot to it. Sadly, im not in charge of written or visual this time around, soooo i can comment on it >.< Ok, well, the layout iteself is uniformed and doesnt change during the entire site, which is definite plus. Majority of the site works, its just that some sections have broken links and some parts (Codename Wa Sailor V) isn't completed yet. >.> Meh... Ok, all and all, layout is fine. The other catagories will have determine the fate of this site. |

|
Written Content Is there lots of written information? Are all profiles, back story, and other textual content accurate? Does the site offer fanfiction or other miscellaneous written content? |
ViluyFirst off, one of the subcategory names is incorrectly spelled, 'collauges' should be 'collages' and 'quizes' should be 'quizzes'. There are the odd spelling mistakes here and there, which I believe were made as the webmistress sounds very young and inexperienced. She herself admits she's not very good at the writing bit *smiles and pats*. That's how we get better though, by trying to do the best we can, and improving when people point out the little things. All in all, the spelling on this site isn't too terribly bad, given some of the ones we've come across in the past. Things like 'join' instead of 'joining', using 'a' instead of 'an', some of the attacks being misspelled (check up The Oracle for proper attack spellings), and that sort of thing need to be worked on. It's pretty minor stuff and doesn't seem to detract from the site much apart from a misspelled file name ('campain' should be 'campaign'). The chat-speak style of writing in the history needs to be changed. It's very hard to understand if you're not into that sort of thing. That being said, there isn't too much writing at all on the site to really review. One thing to work on is the size of the font used in the layout - it's too small for proper viewing. I have to get right up close to be able to read it. Plus the colour is too pale against a white background. I am not sure what background is supposed to be here, but there isn't one at the moment (maybe needing to work on server settings?) so it shows up as plain white. |

|
Visual Content What kind of visual content is offered? Is it efficiently organized and intuitively accessible? Are all visual media offered legally? |
TelluOh, what a pretty layout! And she linked my site, too! I like this already. :) Alright, alright, let's get down to my
actual review... I'll do this section-by-section.
|

|
Overall How does the site flow, overall? What are the wholistic impressions the viewer gets from the site? |
PtilolOoooh... pretty. There is lots here to look over. I almost don't know where to start.
|

- broken